Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high) - for all countries


The series "Logistics" contains 5,334 data rows in 7 data sets for 164 countries.
Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.
Worldbank
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high) Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents. /statistic/logistics%20performance%20index%3A%20customs%20clearance%20process

Data for all countries

Loading, please wait!

Chart type



Country selection



Year

Select a year with a radio button above or type in a year between 2007 and 2016.

Please enter a year between 2007 and 2016!
Country
Singapore
Singapore
Germany
Germany
Netherlands
Netherlands
Finland
Finland
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Canada
Canada
Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Sweden
Sweden
Luxembourg
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Switzerland
Japan
Japan
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
Belgium
Belgium
Denmark
Denmark
Austria
Austria
United States
United States
France
France
South Africa
South Africa
Czech Republic
Czech Republic
Norway
Norway
Qatar
Qatar
Australia
Australia
Israel
Israel
Spain
Spain
Ireland
Ireland
Korea, South
Korea, South
Italy
Italy
Lithuania
Lithuania
Estonia
Estonia
Portugal
Portugal
China
China
Slovakia
Slovakia
Poland
Poland
Chile
Chile
Turkey
Turkey
New Zealand
New Zealand
India
India
Kenya
Kenya
Malaysia
Malaysia
Bahrain
Bahrain
Panama
Panama
Iceland
Iceland
Cyprus
Cyprus
Latvia
Latvia
Thailand
Thailand
Croatia
Croatia
Botswana
Botswana
Hungary
Hungary
Romania
Romania
Uganda
Uganda
Rwanda
Rwanda
Slovenia
Slovenia
Mexico
Mexico
Greece
Greece
Kuwait
Kuwait
Malawi
Malawi
Brunei
Brunei
Uruguay
Uruguay
Malta
Malta
Tanzania
Tanzania
Oman
Oman
Brazil
Brazil
Peru
Peru
Egypt
Egypt
Lebanon
Lebanon
World
World
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Indonesia
Indonesia
Côte d'Ivoire
Côte d'Ivoire
Pakistan
Pakistan
Bahamas
Bahamas
Namibia
Namibia
Ecuador
Ecuador
Comoros
Comoros
Argentina
Argentina
Cambodia
Cambodia
Philippines
Philippines
Solomon Islands
Solomon Islands
Ethiopia
Ethiopia
Niger
Niger
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bangladesh
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka
Jordan
Jordan
Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso
Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Serbia
Serbia
Mozambique
Mozambique
Togo
Togo
Nicaragua
Nicaragua
Guatemala
Guatemala
Central African Republic
Central African Republic
Nigeria
Nigeria
Ghana
Ghana
Mali
Mali
Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau
Burma
Burma
Bulgaria
Bulgaria
Guyana
Guyana
Moldova
Moldova
Mongolia
Mongolia
Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic
Maldives
Maldives
Paraguay
Paraguay
Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago
Cuba
Cuba
Djibouti
Djibouti
El Salvador
El Salvador
Algeria
Algeria
Jamaica
Jamaica
Iran
Iran
Fiji
Fiji
Madagascar
Madagascar
Costa Rica
Costa Rica
Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan
Senegal
Senegal
Ukraine
Ukraine
Guinea
Guinea
Georgia
Georgia
Mauritius
Mauritius
São Tomé and Príncipe
São Tomé and Príncipe
Albania
Albania
Sudan
Sudan
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Morocco
Morocco
Montenegro
Montenegro
Honduras
Honduras
Macedonia
Macedonia
Bhutan
Bhutan
Colombia
Colombia
Benin
Benin
Mauritania
Mauritania
Cameroon
Cameroon
Chad
Chad
Gabon
Gabon
Liberia
Liberia
Belarus
Belarus
Gambia
Gambia
Burundi
Burundi
Afghanistan
Afghanistan
Iraq
Iraq
Eritrea
Eritrea
Russia
Russia
Congo, Republic of the
Congo, Republic of the
Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan
Venezuela
Venezuela
Bolivia
Bolivia
Tunisia
Tunisia
Armenia
Armenia
Nepal
Nepal
Tajikistan
Tajikistan
Lesotho
Lesotho
Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone
Libya
Libya
Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea
Laos
Laos
Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan
Angola
Angola
Haiti
Haiti
Timor-Leste
Timor-Leste
Somalia
Somalia
Syria
Syria

Source: Worldbank
We use Cookies, by using this website or closing the menu you accept the usage of cookies. OK